The New Modern Family
Jaclynn Hanson
Never has it been more obvious that the days of Ward & June
Cleaver are over than when viewing today’s typical television sitcom. Yes, the vision of the All-American family is
in our rearview mirror and our new favorite TV moms and dads are drunk behind
the wheel on their way to pick up their illegitimate children from jail. Popular television series today showcase a
new normal of today’s modern family and
they go about their daily endeavors in a shameless fashion. In an attempt to keep up with a changing
familial landscape, television series such as Modern Family, Breaking Bad,
Weeds and Shameless exhibit, in varying degrees of intensity and humor, the
changing tides of today’s family structure.
While this generates a much broader lens for viewers, it simultaneously
leaves people without same-sex parents, a sibling in prison, or a drug
addiction feeling as if they no longer belong under the “average American
family” classification. A new spin on
the American family, and for most they are now the outsiders looking in. Or, if framed in a true-to-life context: those
damn nosy neighbors discovering the marijuana greenhouse operating next door.
The recipe for a successful family-centered sitcom in the past was
simple. Same-sex parents with jobs, a
couple kids and a pet would be presented with some type of dilemma or
predicament and together they would find a solution and overcome it all as they
hugged it out to with the background sounds of violins at each show’s end. While to a certain extent this formula is
still being utilized in today’s most popular television shows, several aspects
have undergone a drastic transformation in an attempt to reflect and address
current societal circumstances. However,
many hit television shows have exacerbated the dramas of the “modern family” to
a degree that has turned what was once a family sitcom that incorporated small
facets of advice and a structure to mimic into a how-to guide to manufacture
and sell drugs, or on the lighter side, how to fashion a boxed-wine enema for
the alcoholic in your family like Peter Gallagher convinced his son Carl to do
for him on Shameless only before he
continues on to give him advice on masturbation (“Simple Pleasures”).
In his book, “Vulgarians at the Gate: Trash TV and Raunch Radio: Raising Standards of
Popular Culture”, Steve Allen defends the old formula for successful television
and expresses concern for the direction television programming is going. He argues that, “clean comedy can be successfully
marketed because it has been for a very long time” as he lists off successful comedians
and actors dating back to Vaudeville days (Vulgarian 53). While I think many people can agree that television
may be a more dangerous venue of exposure to children for most of the shock and
awe programs we have become accustomed to, it has become a far more successful
strategy for television to push the envelope than that of clean comedy once
enjoyed and reveled by previous generations.
To put it in perspective, there was once a time when a pregnant Lucille
Ball raised eyebrows with CBS execs and the episode of Ellen in which Ellen
DeGeneres came out to the public generated one of the highest rated shows only to
get cancelled shortly after (Douglas 11).
These are topics that we are no longer afraid of, and the kinds of
topics we don’t give second thought to.
Viewers today would tune in only if Ellen DeGeneres gets knocked up by
Lucille Ball.
It
has long been debated whether or not television viewers emulate or frame their
thinking in synchronization with what they see as “normal” on the programs they
watch. If this is true, will we be
seeing more middle-class suburban families facing financial difficulties seeking
careers in drug trafficking or will we sympathize with the morally bankrupt schemers
trying to get by in the inner city? Or,
in a less criminal generalization, will we not bat an eye when our grandfather
introduces us to his Latin lover thirty years his junior? Although it’s hard to prove to what extent
our culture reciprocates what we see on
television, it is interesting to note what author Marvin Moore found in his
study of the “American family” on prime-time television where he suggests, “prime-time
network television tends to reinforce conservative to moderate models of family
life while also presenting a diversity of non-standard interpretations of
family which are, for the most part, comfortably framed in the non-threatening
comedic form" (Moore 44). The idea of diversity being presented in the non-threatening comedic
form can be seen in many sitcoms showcasing a different take on the typical
American family. A prime example would
be ABC’s award winning Modern Family,
a show that thrives on awkward situations and satirical humor as opposed to gang
violence and explosives.
Showtime’s Shameless
incorporates all the ingredients for one majorly screwed up American family. Drug use, alcohol abuse, close encounters
with incest, frequent encounters with police and a mixed race infant who ingests
cocaine under supervision of his older sister essentially define this south
side Chicago family modern family. One
cannot help but wonder if there really is a significant population of families that
survive (and maybe even thrive) in these kinds of outrageous situations. Maybe the white, working, middle-class, same
sex parents married with children structure might be evolving and changing
before our eyes on the TV screen, but are they changing to that extent in real
life or is this the only way television series can earn their keep these
days? While the problems familial
sitcoms of the past faced were arguably cliché, mild-natured and relied more on
cheesy one-liners than one night stands and drug benders, they drew a closer
picture of the average American that most of today’s hit dramas portray.
In turning away from the typical family setting, new television
families are wilder and crazier than ever – often depicting a lifestyle of
extreme highs and lows never before seen on television. Even cable programming that not long ago featured
the familiar faces of the Tanners, the Conners, and the Taylors has seen a
shift in pushing the envelope with heavy drug and sexual references as well as
a normalizing of criminal behavior never imagined by Danny Tanner or Tim “The
Tool Man” Taylor. Now, the families
invited into our living rooms on a Wednesday night are the rebellious Whites
and the conniving Botwins. We used to
watch Roseanne Conner flip pancakes over the stove and now we watch Walter
White cook crystal meth to perfection in a pair of tighty-whities. Our new standard for the American family in
television has definitely reframed our idea of today’s normal, modern, shameless,
and bad. The majority may feel as if
they are the nosy neighbors looking in on a wild and crazy family dynamic, but
we sure do enjoy watching the chaos from the safety from our own front yards.



I really enjoyed reading this blog post. I agree that the dynamics of the "average" family shown on TV has changed immensely. I had a hard time figuring out if you were arguing that it was a good or bad thing though. I personally have mixed feelings. I watch Weeds, Shameless, and Breaking Bad so I can't say that I don't think shows like them shouldn't exist because I love them, but I do understand how parents would be worried that TV is a bad influence on their kids. The major question is wether they create the shows because this is how the typical family acts or rather to have good entertainment.
ReplyDeleteReading this made me think of shows on the Disney channel and how things has drastically changed for them as well. Before, shows like "Lizzie Mcguire" and "Even Stevens" were legit family shows and watchable in my eyes but now almost all the shows are just garbage (no offense). Kids are wearing less clothes and demonstrating not "PG13" like actions (like flirting and relationship issues) when it is a kids channel. Just like your blog post, I agree that these Modern Family shows are not how it use to be and I think it's because these people are running out of ideas and they need ratings. Well, that and times are changing and people are more open with exposing reality and what they don't realize is, by doing so they are affecting many young viewers because some would see that this is the right thing to do. I think it's just up to the parents to monitor what their child is viewing because I have a feeling it will only get worse before it gets better. It sucks, but this is reality.
ReplyDeleteI think that the way we define "normal" is what has changed. We understand that that perfect "leave it to beaver" family doesn't exist--and although it is a nice sentiment, in our day and age where reality is held above all else the dynamic of the modern family is going to change. Whether or not that is a good thing is up to debate, but I think it is important to understand that as a culture we are more open and honest about our struggles--especially within our familial lives. We understand that not all families are perfect and that dysfunction doesn't have to mean that your family is inherently "bad". Whether or not these depictions of an exaggerated dysfunctional family help or hurt our culture is hard to say, but it does open up the discussion--which I have never found to be a bad thing.
ReplyDeleteThat was a great read. The quote that stuck with me the most was, "Now, the families invited into our living rooms on a Wednesday night are the rebellious Whites and the conniving Botwins". I do wonder if we subconsciously begin to accept more of these dynamic family roles as we see them more frequently on television. If we invite them into our living rooms through the television, it would only make sense if we did more so in real life as well! The comparisons you made to the movies we used to watch is what really brought this article home for me.
ReplyDelete